Common problems

Batch-to-batch variability is often measured extensively but rarely explained

Scientists and engineers involved in upstream processing typically face several difficulties:

  • A significant amount of time is spent compiling data from different sources and with different formats (inline, online, offline, set points …), extracting relevant information from raw data and preparing graphs and reports.
  • Batch to batch reproducibility is low
  • The high complexity of biological systems hinders process understanding
Common problems

Our solutions

Software license - Bioreactor software

Our software was developed in collaboration with Sanofi during the CALIPSO project. It features a user-friendly interface to ensure data completeness and re-usability, perform calculations (mu, Qp, Qs, …) in a few clicks, compare data and generate automatic reports. This allows significant time saving and reduces the risk of errors, thus allowing scientists and engineers to focus on their core activities.

Our software also provides mechanistic simulation capabilities allowing to gain process understanding and reduce the number of experiments.

Learn more

Comprehensive support - Automated data structuration

Our software already contains some data import functionalities. But we know each team works in a unique environment, with specific needs and constraints. To bridge the gap between flexibility and standardization, we offer the development of custom scripts to automate the import of experimental data in our structured format. The scripting tool is in an open format such that data scientists can also develop their own scripts as needed.

Because data standardization is a pillar of exploiting your data, may it be through Ypso-Facto software or your own solutions, automated data structuration opens a wide range of possibilities.

Collaborative partnership - Extended team

Our team of experts provides comprehensive upstream process development services. We work alongside your scientists and engineers, challenging assumptions and complementing internal initiatives.

For instance, our “EXPLORE” package is a good way to kick-start a new journey towards the implementation of simulation tools. We demonstrate the benefits of modeling approaches on a concrete example and provide a methodology to be re-used on future projects.

Case studies

Process: CHO cell culture

Product: mAb

Results: This work aimed at comparing our mechanistic model with models traditionally used in the literature. We fitted on batch data

  • our mechanistic model (blue dashed line),
  • a Monod model with one route only considering μ1=f(Glc, Gln, NH4+, Lac) (red dotted line),
  • and a Monod model with three routes considering μ1=f(Glc, Gln, NH4+, Lac), μ2=f(Glc, Lac), μ3=f(Lac), (green dash-dot line).

Then, we compared predictions of the 3 models on fed-batch data in terms of VCD, glucose, lactate, glutamine, ammonia and IgG concentrations (Fig. 1). It was found that our model outperforms the Monod models. Indeed, with the Monod model considering one route only, the VCD is significantly underestimated since glutamine is completely depleted. With the Monod model considering three routes, the VCD continues to increase even at the end of the culture since glucose is still present. No Monod model could be found to represent this set of data.

 

biologics-upstream-CS1-1

Fig1: comparison between experimental (dots) and simulation (lines)  results for commonly measured quantities

These results suggest the need for a more detailed description of the physico-phenomena at state than the classical Monod models. In particular, our model allows simulating the concentrations of all amino acids. This allowed to identify that some amino acids like Asparagine (Asn) were limiting (Fig. 2). Performing fed-batch experiments with the addition of well targeted amino acids allowed to significantly improve process performances.

biologics-upstream-CS1-1

Fig2: comparison between experimental (dots) and simulation (lines) results for amino acids

Key message: our mechanistic model for mAb production does not only account for glucose, glutamine, lactate and ammonia but also all amino acids.

Further reading: mAb production kinetics in CHO batch culture: exploring extracellular and intracellular dynamics

Your questions, answered

The data structuration part of the software can be used for any type of microorganism. The mechanistic model is available for both CHO and E Coli cultures.

The number of experiments depends on the objectives and constraints of the project. To give a rough idea, with a dozen of bioreactors, a first version of the model can be obtained.

The mechanistic model embedded in the bioreactor software can predict the impact of a number of operating parameters including:

  • the concentrations of glucose, glutamine and all amino acids in the culture medium
  • the concentrations of glucose, glutamine and all amino acids in the feed
  • the feeding strategy (moment of addition, volume of addition, flowrate, etc)
  • a switch from batch to perfusion culture

Want to know more?

Don't hesitate to contact us!